iWritebox | History and Nature of Vaccines

History and Nature of Vaccines

vaccinations are not all alike

Way back in the mists of time I recall learning about the miraculous development of Vaccines, this was in the 1960’s when I was attending Primary School and I was a true ‘science nerd’ who stuck his hand up precociously whenever the teacher asked the class a question; I always scored very highly in lower school science exams because I was genuinely interested and had read very widely in the subject.

I went on to study science, and many other subjects, I was blessed with a curious and questing mind which refused to be tamed in the stricture of conventional academia.

Anyway, the first real vaccine happened as a kind of accident, it is curious just how many major scientific breakthroughs occur as the result of serendipity, or plain accident!

Smallpox was the first true vaccine, and in actual fact this was simply copying nature: it was observed that farmhands who developed ‘Cowpox’ as a result of milking infected Cows never developed Smallpox even if they were in close proximity of an infected household, something seemed to be protecting them.

The man who was observant and astute enough to see this was happening went by the name of Edward Jenner, an English doctor and this was in 1796; the very mild illness of Cowpox which resulted in a ‘blister’ forming and perhaps a mild headache conferred broad immunity to all similar viruses, including the Smallpox virus.

This observation, and subsequent adoption of this process formed the beginnings of effective medicine; finally doctors could make a significant difference to the outcomes for people!

The development of more vaccines took place following this, all through the 1800’s and well into the 20th Century.


Cowpox enables a vaccine for smallpox

The underlying principle of Vaccination has been consistent: the body is exposed to viral material, this could be weakened forms of a disease, or even in the case of Smallpox another virus which has similar properties to the target illness, but does not make you ill. The weakened form of a virus might be irradiated to render it unable to reproduce; in each case the body’s immune response is able to be alerted and to ‘remember’ the shape and form of the virus: when the body encounters the fully ‘wild’ form of the virus it has a genetic record to work from in producing Phagocytes and antibodies.

This principle is a good one, but it cannot be applied endlessly, and for every virus. The complexity of viruses and how they attack a host is very involved, in the case of the Sars-Covid virus the situation is further complicated, this is not a natural virus, this did not develop in nature, it was produced in a viral research lab*, this is not just my opinion or a spurious claim: it has been declared by many different people, one of the more interesting being a ‘Whistle blower’ interviewed by Tucker Carlson and many other media producers reveals some interesting points about this Sars-Covid type virus.

What we are seeing with these rushed Covid vaccines is something entirely new, the manufacturers are saying that their vaccines cannot provide immunity, or behave like a classic, true vaccine – look this up for yourself, go to one of the pharmaceutical companies websites and read their ‘small print’.

What this ‘vaccine’ is can be best described by their own words:

Unlike a traditional vaccine that uses inactivated, dead, or portions of actual virus to spur an immune response, mRNA delivers a message to your body’s cells via a lipid nanoparticle envelope that instructs the cells to generate the spike protein found on the surface of a coronavirus that initiates infection.[vi],[vii] Instructing cells to generate the spike protein spurs an immune response, including generation of antibodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

As they say, this is nothing like a ‘traditional vaccine’, it does not contain any part of the Covid virus, it works by using a lipid suspension with a ‘Nanoparticle’ (a micro sized machine, or section of genetic material) this is complicated stuff, it is messing around with the mechanisms which enables infection; potentially it sounds plausible and clever, but really it is not known what the long term outcomes will be, plus we are hearing about some strange side-effects and even deaths which result, the research is still being done, and the field results will of course feed into the modification of the ‘vaccine’; there is no long term immunity and they state themselves that this is not a true vaccine. 

Everything about this alleged pandemic is spurious, questionable and shrouded in lies and hyperbole.

We do not know what the fallout of mass ‘vaccination’ will be, plus we also know immunity is not really on the table, so just what is this vaccination supposed to do for you?

You will have to decide for yourself, but for the love of God do some research and don’t simply accept what the mainstream media are telling you, or indeed your government: we know that corporations are, predictably, stating that people will not be able to use their services and products, or even enter their buildings, we know that Airlines are calling for vaccination with this Nano-particle hybrid concoction to be proven in order to fly. I don’t know about you but I think we need much more research and information, for a condition which 99% of people recover from without any problems, why if this ‘vaccination’ does not confer any immunity or real protection is this being mandated, and made compulsory?

This is not a vaccine.

We need to be really clear. We’re using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions.

This is not a vaccine. This is an mRNA packaged in a fat envelope, that is delivered to a cell.

It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.

It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term, and they’re a legally defined term under public health law, they’re legally defined term under the CDC and FDA standards.

And a vaccine specifically has to stimulate both an immunity within the person who is receiving it, but it also has to disrupt transmission.

And that is not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell, it is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment.

But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of the public health authorities, because then people would say, well what other treatments are there?